首页> 外文OA文献 >Diagnostic criteria of vascular dementia in CADASIL
【2h】

Diagnostic criteria of vascular dementia in CADASIL

机译:CADASIL中血管性痴呆的诊断标准

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background and Purpose— Subcortical ischemic vascular dementia (SIVD) is a major subtype of vascular dementia (VaD). Recently, the diagnostic criteria of VaD have been modified to encompass this entity. Application of these criteria in CADASIL, a genetic model of SIVD, may help to better assess their significance. The aim of this study was to compare different sets of diagnostic criteria of VaD in a population of CADASIL patients. \ud\udMethods— Different sets of diagnostic criteria of VaD (DSMIV, ICD10, standard NINDS-AIREN, modified NINDS-AIREN for SIVD) were applied to 115 CADASIL patients. Diagnosis of VaD was made through 2 steps: (1) diagnosis of dementia and (2) association of dementia to lesions of vascular origin. The percentage of patients satisfying the different sets and the concordance between these criteria was analyzed. \ud\udResults— At least 1 set of criteria was satisfied for diagnosis in 29 subjects with dementia. In this group of patients, the sensitivity of the DSM IV, ICD 10, and standard NINDS-AIREN criteria for VaD was, respectively, 79%, 72%, and 45%. In contrast, the sensitivity of the NINDS-AIREN criteria for SIVD was 90%. The incomplete sensitivity of these last criteria was related to the absence of focal signs in some patients. The neuroimaging criteria were satisfied in all patients with dementia. \ud\udConclusions— The modified NINDS-AIREN criteria of SIVD are the most sensitive VaD criteria in CADASIL. Among these criteria, the neuroimaging criteria, although poorly specific to dementia, have a complete sensitivity. In contrast, focal signs were inconstant in CADASIL patients with dementia.
机译:背景与目的-皮层下缺血性血管性痴呆(SIVD)是血管性痴呆(VaD)的主要亚型。最近,VaD的诊断标准已被修改以涵盖该实体。这些标准在CADIVIL(SIVD的遗传模型)中的应用可能有助于更好地评估其重要性。这项研究的目的是比较一组CADASIL患者中VaD的不同诊断标准。 \ ud \ ud方法-对115例CADASIL患者应用了不同的VaD诊断标准集(DSMIV,ICD10,标准NINDS-AIREN,改良的SIND的NINDS-AIREN)。 VaD的诊断通过两个步骤进行:(1)痴呆症的诊断和(2)痴呆症与血管源性病变的关联。分析了满足不同组的患者百分比以及这些标准之间的一致性。 \ ud \ ud结果-在29位痴呆症患者中至少满足了一套诊断标准。在这组患者中,DSM IV,ICD 10和标准NINDS-AIREN标准对VaD的敏感性分别为79%,72%和45%。相反,NINDS-AIREN标准对SIVD的敏感性为90%。这些最后标准的不完全敏感性与某些患者缺乏局灶性体征有关。所有痴呆患者均符合神经影像学标准。 \ ud \ ud结论-修改后的SIVD的NINDS-AIREN准则是CADASIL中最敏感的VaD准则。在这些标准中,神经影像学标准尽管对痴呆的特异性较弱,但具有完全的敏感性。相反,CADASIL痴呆患者的病灶体征是不稳定的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号